Ralph Laurenralph lauren canada perfumes come in a diversity of flavors because the world is filled with a wide variety of women. Besides,cheap ralph lauren one perfume will not handle all of the moods and situationsralph lauren canada sale a woman might find herself in.http://www.mcwc.ca You can choose from Ralph Lauren perfumes with titles like Glamorous, cheap pandoraGlamorous Daylight, Lauren, Romance, Polo Sport for women, Cheap Tiffany SaleTurquoise, Cool, Ralph, Ralph Rocks, Hot and new for 2007, the Ralph Rocks labels.michael kors bags outletRalph Lauren Canada Each Ralph Lauren perfume is made with a particular lifestyle in mind,cheap burberry bags and each RalphPandora Canada Lauren Perfume is created with quality as its true essence.ralph lauren canada The perfume Lauren,Cheap Tiffany UK with its flowery and woodsy blend of fragrances,Tiffany UK was a daytime fragrance intended for the growing number of businesslike women in the US to wear to the office.
Cheap Polo Ralph Lauren Outlet Sale Australia - www.relentus.com Ralph Lauren Australia big sale,Ralph Lauren polo shirts,sweaters,jackets,kids,bags,shorts 70% discount,Over $99 free shipping.Buy genuine Cheap Ralph Lauren Australia here,various styles of ralph lauren outlet are cheapest sale,100% quality!Offical ralph lauren outlet australia store Cheap Ralph Lauren online sale ralph lauren bags,hats with high quality lowest price,over $90 free shipping.Cheap Pandora Charms On Sale - www.ecgrp.net - Pandora? Australia,Shop Buy Authorized Online Retailer For Pandora Charms, Free Shipping Over AU$ 50, Cheap Pandora Charms Sale Are Here.Browse our extensive range of Pandora Jewelry, including bracelets, charms, earrings and rings at Charm Me Australia. Ralph Lauren Outlet Australia Free Shipping available.
Home > Design & Innovation, Voice of the Customer > Innovation – Beware the Voice of the Customer

Innovation – Beware the Voice of the Customer

January 1st, 2013

Beware

Malcom Gladwell, in his #1 national bestseller “Blink” (2005), recounts fascinating results from Columbia University professors Sheena Iyengar and Raymond Fisman’s speed dating studies.  The professors ran speed dating nights across the street from Columbia University for university graduate students.  The events were like other speed dating events in which attendees would meet members of the opposite sex for a short set period of time (four to six minutes) and check a yes or no box on a form listing all their “dates” for the evening.  If both the man and woman checked each other’s names, they would given the information by which to meet each other and pursue a relationship.

But on a few occasions, in the interest of psychology and economics, Professor Iyengar and Fisman’s respective fields of study, attendees were asked to fill out a short questionnaire asking them to rate what they were looking for in a potential partner on a scale of 1 to 10 on six criteria that included attractiveness, shared interests, sense of humor, sincerity, intelligence and ambition.  They were asked to do so before the event, shortly after the event, a month later and then six months later.  In addition, at the end of each “date” during an event, they were asked to rate the person they’d just met on a scale of 1 – 10 and for the aforementioned attributes.

As you can tell, by the end of an event, attendees declared what they wanted, who they’ve chosen and how they rated who they’d chosen versus what they wanted.  So what happened?  Well, Mr. Gladwell reports that Professors Iyengar and Fisman found that the people to whom their subjects were actually attracted didn’t match the attributes to which they’d said they were attracted prior to the event.  But now it gets a little trickier.  If a subject said they wanted attractive, sincere mates but chose funny, intelligent ones, when asked after the event which attributes they preferred, they answered funny and intelligent. But when asked a month later, they could switch back to their initial preferences.

When the two professors were asked to interpret the results, the psychologist said she didn’t know what it meant while the economist said “the real me is the me revealed by my actions”.  Given the stated preferences changed and there is no report of the same candidates attending a second event so their actions could truly reveal the real them, I’m with the psychologist.

Download “Service Design & Innovation – Service Blueprinting”

What does this have to do with anything about which we write on this blog?  Well, I think the title says it all — “Beware the Voice of the Customer”.  If we don’t know what we want in a partner in whom we might vest our time and emotions, imagine the challenge to clearly and consistently state our preferences for a product or service over the time necessary for a company to recoup the investment to develop and launch?

So how do we successfully develop and launch new products and services if we can’t trust what customers tell us?  Well, we do have some tools and philosophies that more readily capture our fickle nature.  Namely observation linked with rapid prototyping.  Meet enough people and you don’t need a list of likes and dislikes.  The process of evolving preferences and product or service attributes meet.  If you wish to discuss VOC and or Design Thinking deployment models, feel free to contact me.

Comments are closed.
Ralph Lauren Online Store : http://www.qfilm.co.uk| Cheap Polo Ralph Lauren UK Outlet Online